Using Penetration Testing to Give Boards Better Security Assurance

A development team can follow secure coding standards, keep their dependencies current, and yet create a vulnerability that nobody notices. Actual attacks do not follow an orderly checklist. A hacker could use an insecure authentication rule and a vulnerable API endpoint, evade an automated password reset workflow or find out that a client account has access to a tenant’s information.

Security assurance Brisbane companies employ penetration testing that looks at the system from an adversarial point of view. Expertly trained testers do not ask whether security controls are in place, but determine if they can be manipulated.

This difference is important for Australian companies who deal with sensitive information such as customer data and financial records, as well as healthcare records or other assets.

The automated scanning is just one aspect of the whole story.

Vulnerability scanners may be helpful. They are able to quickly detect outdated code and headers that are not secure (CVEs) and known CVEs and obvious configuration errors. What they generally cannot understand is the way an application is supposed to behave.

Imagine a portal for customers that lets users change their account number within an application, and also get invoices from a different company. The server may give perfectly valid answers which is why the automated scanner will not find anything unusual. Human testers can spot the error in authorization and act immediately.

Tests for quality web penetration combine automation with manual investigation. Testing focuses on authentication, sessions and access controls as well as injection risks, API behaviors, configuration weaknesses and business procedures.

SaaS-based systems raise their own questions about security

Cloud applications that are multi-tenant require extra caution when testing, as one mistake could have a large impact on many users at one time.

Effective Saas penetration testing should examine tenant isolation, privileged functions, API authorization, role changes, account recovery, data exposure, and integrations with external services. The tester should not only test if the feature works but also to determine if it is able to be used in ways that was never intended by the developers.

A user, for instance, assigned a basic role might not be able to see an administrative role in the interface. However, this does not mean they can’t use it directly. It is crucial to try the API out instead of just looking at what appears.

Modern web applications have an enhanced attack surface

Applications today typically combine JavaScript front-ends and APIs, cloud service providers Identity providers, microservices and other services. The weakness could be in any individual component or in the trust relationship between them.

These connections are completed by a thorough application penetration test. Testing can include checking the way tokens are generated, whether sensitive endpoints enforce authentication on a regular basis, or how the data stored by users is moved across services.

Siege Cyber is specialized in this kind of application testing. It is able to work with the latest APIs and frameworks as well as cloud-hosted applications and intricate architectures.

This report is an excellent tool for developers to identify the answer.

Finding vulnerabilities is just half the task. Security testing provides the most benefit when engineers are able to reproduce the issue, understand the risk, and remediate it with confidence.

Siege Cyber reports include evidence of reproduction, steps to reproduce, risk ratings, impact analysis, as well as practical instructions for resolving the issue. Technical teams get the information required to address the issue while stakeholders from the business receive an executive level description of the threat. Critical findings can also be raised during the engagement rather than waiting for the final report.

The retesting of the system following remediation gives an additional layer of assurance in that it proves the original problem has been resolved without creating a brand new one.

Organizations looking for independent validation, evidence of compliance or greater confidence prior to releasing a product can gain from penetration testing. It creates a safe setting to observe how an attacker of skill could attack the system. The ability to determine the answer before an actual adversary can do it is what makes the process worthwhile.

Subscribe

Recent Post